April 19, 2025

Anton LaVey was a mediocre douchebag

 Or: “How the Church of Satan founder was a piece of shit in lots of boring ways, too”

The original title for this was “Satanic rule of earth #9: Do not harm little children*” but then it expanded on us as a project.

We’re going to talk about three things in order, with the purpose to prove with evidence that — far from being a diabolical, monstrous villain of infamy and atrocious deeds — the author of The Satanic Bible was just boringly and commonly horrible, as so many shitty dudes you already know are shitty.

  1. “Anton LaVey’s first marriage to a 15-year-old girl was pretty fucked up, huh? Initially that’s all it was supposed to be. Grown man grooming and marrying a child. But of course it’s worse than that and doesn’t stop there.
  2. Oh, damn LaVey was gross.” LaVey being a weird little guy who liked smellz is somewhat well-known, sure. But in the process of working on this, we just kept running across more examples of LaVey’s romantic relationships being shitty and even abusive in the mundane ways so many men are, and that on top of the physical unpleasantness of not bathing or brushing his teeth. Really unpleasant dude.
  3. Wow, Anton LaVey did not give a shit about child sexual abuse going on.” Mind you, this is not in a “ritual abuse” way. Nothing so salacious or lurid as that. We mean the typical, “Eh, what’s the big deal?” when people around him hurt children, especially when it was powerful people and those he considered his friends.

That’s why this is so fucking long: Anton LaVey was a mediocre douchebag, and it starts way back and goes on until the day he fucking dies.


1. “Anton LaVey’s first marriage to a 15-year-old girl was pretty fucked up, huh?”

This was the first and initially only issue we wanted to talk about. That said, we were not able to definitively answer this original question about California state law:

The age of consent in California has been 18 years old since 1911, but what are (and circa 1950 were) the loopholes as far as adults being able to lawfully marry minors?

(See also, FineLaw.com and George Mason University.)

For years, the standard Church of Satan line about Anton LaVey’s first wife Carole Lansing is that, despite four decades of statutory law, it was actually totally cool and normal back then for a 21 man to marry and then impregnate a 15-year-old girl in California in 1950.

@ChurchofSatan 13 Sep 2024
LaVey’s first wife Carole Lansing was 15 when they were married in 1951, he was 21. This was not an uncommon age for marriage at the time and her parents approved of the wedding. They were happily married for 9 years before going their separate ways on good terms. 

Trying to apply contemporary morality to normal relationships 3/4ths of a century ago is ridiculous. His relationships were always consensual and with women  whose age was comparable to his own.

It’s not worth wasting your time with this troll, they been making ignorant baseless claims since the start and are just trying to bait people into replying.

And it may even be true that her parents went along with it in 1951!

But.

This Rolling Stone article from 1991 pushes their ages back a year further.

Rolling Stone
Sympathy for the Devil
It’s not easy being evil in a world that’s gone to hell
September 5th, 1991
By Lawrence Wright
Photographs by Mary Ellen mark (black and white photo of Anton LaVey sitting with head in hands)

That’s a pretty big difference.

Anton LaVey was born April 11, 1930. If it’s correct that Carole Louise Lansing was born Aug. 20, 1936, that means that — depending on when in the year they met in 1950 — Carole Lansing was 13-14 years old while LaVey was 19-20. Imagine for a moment the two met in June. That’s a 20-year-old man and 13-year-old girl. Think about yourself at those ages, or people you know now. How do you feel about that?

From above, they get married in September 1951 (Carole 15, LaVey 21), and about 11 months later, their daughter Karla is born July 31, 1952.

So someone looking to defend Anton LaVey in terms of adhering to LaVeyan Satanism’s “law and order philosophy” would have to say, yeah, the 20-year-old man met the “tiny teenage blonde” in 1950 and then had a completely chaste relationship with her up until the point where he secured her parents’ legal permission for marriage and took her across state lines to Reno to do it for some reason, consummating it within a few months but after they were husband and wife and it was all completely legal by the letter of the law.

There is also simpler explanation, and that’s that Anton LaVey, the noted Ayn Rand-appreciator and in many ways bog-standard right-libertarian was also bog-standard in that way, too: chafing at any government regulations forcing their girlfriend to sit in a car seat.

We don’t have dates to go along with these photos, but just giving it the eye test, some things about this sort of don’t change.

From Burton Wolfe’s 2008 book The Black Pope, we do have this, as well for Carole Lansing:

Carole Lansing, first and only wife of Anton (Tony) LaVey,
as she looked circa 1952.
Anton and Carole were married
for nine years
and had one child, by Carole,
Karla Maritza.
They were divorced in 1960.
Carole never remarried.
Neither did Anton.
Photo from the private collection of
Anton Szandor LaVey.

Wolfe has some issues, and we’ll get to the bit about Anton LaVey remarrying later.

Anyway, at least the “Eleven Satanic Rules of Earth” that also appeared in 1969’s The Satanic Bible explicitly state, “Do not harm little children,” so we do have to give that to LaVey that.

(Then again, “little”?)

It’s not really a stretch to see the similarity and consilience between a “law and order philosophy” and “age of consent by territory” aficionados traveling to other countries and exploiting their poverty and laws. “No, no, no officers. I waited to make sexual advances on the child prostitute until after I got the mating signal, you see. That makes it legal and Satanically ethical.”

OK, you might say, “That’s all a reach,” or agree with the Church of Satan’s official line above that, laws aside (and, for example, the cratering of Jerry Lee Lewis’s career when he at 22 married a 13-year-old in 1958), it was a different time. What’s the big deal?

Importantly, an apologist may argue, LaVey continued to pursue relations with younger women from then on, sure, but mostly not teenagers anymore. And they were “student witch” groupies coming to him, or whatever. He did not habitually or by preference seek out 13-year-olds after his first marriage.

But.

As fun and easy as it is to dunk on the Catholic Church for stuff like this, this is more a feature of the level of power and influence one organization has over society versus the other.

Church of Satan responding to tweet "The Church of Satan protects rapists and child abusers" with "You must be confusing us with the Catholics"

A description of opportunity is not really a statement of virtues of values, and statements mean little when set next to real actions.

We’ve shown before that LaVey was politically weird and off-putting. That is, in terms of larger politics, neo-Nazi and white nationalist ties were allowed and even cultivated by Anton LaVey and the Church of Satan for years. Antifascist researcher Spencer Sunshine, PhD’s latest book goes into much exhaustive detail, if you need a better authority than us.

But self-evidently, you don’t get to the point of recording this alternate take with white nationalist cartoonist “A. Wyatt Mann” as a lil’ whoopsie.

However, here we also specifically mean Anton LaVey was off-putting in terms of older men and younger women and girls when the older men were neo-Nazis.

“Do not harm little children,” remember? But in reality, Anton LaVey and his church did not care if you did.

Tweet by spencer sunshine @transform6789
Here's that picture of James Mason (Siege) with Peter Gilmore (Church of Satan) I've been looking for. Also included: Mason's underage girlfriend Eva and Gilmore's wife Nadramia
Signed copy of The Satanic Bible: “To James Mason - a man of courage and reason, a rare combination”

From that previous article:

Mason is a man called the the “Godfather of Fascist Terrorism” but also a pretty open child predator, eventually arrested on charges of possession of child pornography for nude photos of one of the 15-year-olds he was “dating”, although the plea deal ultimately didn’t include that in his conviction.

Mason was 40 years old in 1992.

This seems like a diversion, and you may even argue it’s too tenuous and therefore unfair, but this same thing is going to come back around again and worse, don’t worry.


2. “Oh, damn LaVey was gross.”

First, let’s rewind a little bit.

LaVey is 21 years old when he marries 15-year-old Carole Lansing. It doesn’t work out, but remember, the Church of Satan’s official narrative is “They were happily married for 9 years before going their separate ways on good terms.

OK, but what actually happened specifically?

By age 29, Wolfe’s book says LaVey was trying to make ends meet playing organ music at Mori’s Point Inn:

Peter H. Gilmore’s 2005 introduction of The Satanic Bible puts it the other way, “LaVey met and became entranced by Diane Hegarty in 1959.”

Hegarty is born July 10, 1942, so if that’s true, she’s 16 or 17 then when meeting 28- or 29-year-old LaVey, who cheats on his now 23-year-old wife Lansing — the mother of his 7-year-old daughter Karla — leading Lansing to divorce him the next year.

(Also, this is still California, so as above, the age of consent is still 18.)

This is how a happy marriage ends? Your husband six years older than you starting an affair with a girl six years younger than you?

This is not to diminish that girl. Hegarty would go on to co-found the Church of Satan with LaVey, she typed and edited The Satanic Bible and other early publications with him, and she was a bookkeeper for the Church of Satan as a legal entity. She’s written out of the history now, but she is why that org kept going and producing anything at all for many years. LaVey sure as fuck wasn’t going to do that yeoman’s shit.

The late Church of Satan founder Anton Szandor LaVey and his partner, Diane Hegarty, at a ceremony in California.
Photograph: Bettmann Archive

But LaVey’s and Hegarty’s own relationship ended in 1984 when, Hegarty alleges, LaVey’s occasions of verbal and physical abuse escalated to a point where she feared for her life and she had to flee their home, the infamous San Francisco “Black House” at 6114 California Street.

This building on California Street in San Francisco, known as the Satan House or the Black House, was used as the headquarters of the Church of Satan formerly run by Anton LaVey. | Deanne Fitzmaurice / San Francisco Chronicle / Polaris

If you’ve only heard of “The Black House” and never seen a picture of it with its neighbors before, how shabby it actually looked may come as a surprise. But it is really important for re-framing all of what else there is to see here.

From the “First Amended Complaint” by Hegarty against LaVey, Dec. 7, 1988 (via early Church of Satan figure and Temple of Set founder Michael Aquino’s 2009 edition of his Church of Satan book):

In the 1998 article “Anton LaVey: Legend and Reality,” Zeena LaVey — his daughter by Hegarty — made a lot of allegations about her father, and characterizes this night in this way:

Not everything that Zeena accuses her father of feels equally plausible, and she’s gone through some wild ideological swings in her life, some of them with her then-partner “Nikolas Schreck” (Barry Dubin), who can safely be described as an esoteric fascist but also many worse things. The pair have done the exact opposite of earn “just take my word for it,” basically.

In any case, even without access to the cited San Francisco police records, Zeena LaVey’s statement certainly does act as another piece of support for Hegarty’s account.

Aquino’s 2009 edition The Church of Satan also includes an except from a Sacramento Bee article of Sep. 22, 1988:

We’re still trying to figure out which lawsuit it is where Hegarty claimed that specifically since the First Amended Complaint that Aquino includes in his book is filed a few months later and doesn’t contain that. It would be nice to find if Carole Lansing’s daughter Karla LaVey ever spoke about that night with Hegarty, rather than just Zeena LaVey secondhand account, since it seems like she wasn’t there. In short, though, we’d say there isn’t really any good reason to doubt that Anton LaVey was a shitty, abusive dude whose preference was to have much younger, less powerful women around him he could exploit for their labor, including sexual labor like bearing him children.

Enter “Blanche Barton” (Sharon Densley).

LaVey and companion Blanche Barton, author of his biography, 'The Secret Life of a Satanist', in 1991. The much younger woman sits on his lap with an arm around his shoulder a look almost of ecstasy and she cradles his chin with one hand as he looks at the camera.

From a 1998 SF Weekly article by Jack Boulware:

Barton was born Oct. 1, 1961, and began a relationship with Anton LaVey, also in 1984. Let’s assume she waits until Hegarty is out of the house in April 1984, so she’s 22 or 23 now with the 54-year-old LaVey. Legal, sure, but boy is that icky as a general dynamic… and also in this specific practice.

From an interview in Burton’s The Black Pope again:

In 1993, Barton gave birth to son “Satan Xerxes Carnacki LaVey,” and she was with him until Anton LaVey died in 1997, possibly from the heart disease exacerbated by never brushing his teeth.

(From Burton and Aquino both quoting the same Sep. 3, 1991 declaration by Hegarty: During the 23 years I lived with defendant LaVey, his health was always a pivotal issue. Though he refused to attend to his teeth or his personal hygiene – never bathing or seeing a dentist – he worried constantly about his hypertension and his heart murmur, diagnosed by Dr. Irving Warner in 1970.”)

When LaVey died, Barton lost her home, too, because LaVey’s abuse of Hegarty and inability to do basic shit contesting her claims in court meant that when Hegarty left and sought her own part of their joint holdings, LaVey got wiped out and bankrupted.

This is even more embarrassing than it looks at first glance because, it turns out, the infamous “Black House” at 6114 California Street had been bought by LaVey’s parents, and then gifted to LaVey and Hegarty for nothing.

LaVey and Carole Lansing had been living in that house since 1956 when LaVey’s parents bought the property and then LaVey and Hegarty lived in together from 1960 to 1984, making it look spookier and occult. The home came into LaVey and Hegarty’s possession in 1971 via agreement, Hegarty says, with LaVey’s dad that Hegarty and LaVey would “pay any indebtedness previously incurred against the property” by Levey, and then it was just theirs.

Burton Wolfe's "The Black Pope" (2008)
Part of the Joint Tenancy Grant Deed conveying ownership of the house at 6114 California Street in San Francisco from “Michael J. Levey and Gertrude A. Levey, his wife,” to “Anton S. LaVey and Diane E. LaVey, his wife in joint tenancy.”
---
Not long after Mike and Gertrude bought the house in 1956 (for $9,500), Anton moved into it with his wife Carole. So far as I can determine, they paid no rent to Mike and Gertrude, while Mike continued to make the mortgage payments on the house.

Which is quite a gift for a couple! Especially given how San Francisco real estate would turn out in the proceeding decades.

So, by the late 1980s, Hegarty wanted what she was legally owed and she was willing to sue to get it, and she got legal judgments in her favor to make it happen. By the early 1990s, LaVey still hadn’t sold the home to be able to pay her what she was owed, and the only person he was willing to sell to was, Hegarty alleged, low-balling what it was worth as a way to be spiteful toward her.

This 1999 SF Gate article by Don Lattin, summarizes it this way:

So LaVey’s friend Don Werby did him a kindness by buying the house, doing so in such a way that it screwed Hegarty out of hundreds of thousands of dollars, and then letting LaVey stay there in the same house his parents had let him move into for free in the 1950s and gifted to him in the 1970s.

What a loser. What a piece of shit. What a pathetic fucking person to hold up as “Magus LaVey,” “Doktor LaVey”. Christ. (Anti-Christ?)

And what a horrible and needless position to put his partner and young child who survived him in given that there was apparently no plan in place for taking care of them after his death.

He didn’t even bother to take care of the home itself while he was alive and had his fans and groupies seeking him out. Again from the SF Gate article:


3. “Wow, Anton LaVey did not give a shit about child sexual abuse going on.”

Eagle-eyed readers will wonder why we skipped over the “has his own troubles” part about Don Werby. Fear not, we will get there. It seems roundabout, but it does tie together.

That SF Weekly article by Jack Boulware published Jun 17, 1998, also included this section on the pre-history of the Church of Satan:

Donald Werby’s wife Willy did not appreciate this. Aquino’s 2009 The Church of Satan includes this letter to the Editor to S.F. Weekly for the week of July 1-7. 1998, responding to the article claims.

So for the record, Willy is not a fan of Wolfe or his book (probably she meant The Devil’s Avenger), but also, the Werbys go way back with LaVey and the Church of Satan (and she helpfully offered up yet another example of LaVey’s Nazi shit).

One more excerpt, quoting Michael Aquino’s The Church of Satan again, this time a 1991 interview with Edward M. Webber, a professional publicity agent who helped form the Church of Satan org in 1966, then we’ll get there:

Again, you may be asking, “Why are you talking about this?”

Because unlike neo-Nazi terrorist and convicted child predator James Mason mentioned above in the previous section, it is undeniable that Anton LaVey knew Donald Werby for decades, and Donald Werby was not bad just because he was rich and into real estate; he was bad because he was a fucking monster who preyed on children for sex.

very grainy black and white photo of man with caption "Donald Werby allegedly organized scavenger hunts for drugs"; picture and caption from The San Francisco Examiner November 28, 1989 via Setemheb

All credit to The Temple of Set High Priest Setemheb for digging deeper and making this story accessible with their 2023 article “My Lack of Respect for Anton LaVey as a Person“.

“Oh! That’s just a Temple of Set guy. You know you can’t trust those theistic weirdos to be normal when it comes to the Church of Satan.”

OK. Here is SF Weekly in 2007:

Paul Wright for Prison Legal News in 2003:

The Los Angeles Times from Aug. 27, 1989:

And the Los Angeles Times from Aug. 28, 1990:

Now yes, Anton LaVey has a lot going on in his life in 1989. At that precise moment, things were really fuckin’ bad for ol’ Stinky Tony — lots of it due to his own choices, mind you. But he made another choice to let Werby be his sugar daddy for the rest of his life. You can argue that LaVey had no idea about the kind of man his friend was over the first three devades they knew each other, but he definitely knew for the last decade. “Do not harm little children” apparently did not extend to 13-year-old girls.

But then, we kind of already knew that about Anton, didn’t we?

F.A.Q. Prisoner Issues
I am in prison or I know someone in prison and they want to practice Satanism. Can the Church of Satan help me?
Satanism is a law and order philosophy and in general we think that too often people have not received punishment that fits in kind and degree their crimes. But we also understand that people can be wrongly convicted based on false or mistaken testimony and that it might take years for exoneration to come—if ever.

We do not allow Active Membership to convicted felons, particularly if the crime shows a violation of Satanic principles for social behavior. If a Church of Satan member is convicted of a felony it should be understood that membership is automatically terminated, more so if the crime is one that breaks basic tenets of Satanism.

“Satanism is a law and order philosophy,” and punishments ought to be harsher (“Lex talionis!”), but it seems like if you’re willing to look the other way about your 63-year-old friend smoking crack and sexually assaulting runaway teenage girls — and you’ve already proven you don’t care about neo-Nazis and white nationalists except that you enjoy promoting them and would like a few more of them to join your org — what even is the line for you?

Hey, people rightfully bristle at all of the bullshit Satanic Panic stuff that the Church of Satan has had to put up with for decades, including LaVey personally. The guy lied a lot for publicity early on and through his whole life, but he was not a cartoon monster in the “Satanic Ritual Abuse” sense. He was not that horrific — or even, it turns out, that exciting.

But Anton LaVey was a douchebag in the very banal and boring sense that you see around you everywhere. That is actually significantly worse than being a decent person who is banal and boring.

Some people even today will howl about all of the “sheep” in society, “the masses” and their “Goodguy Badges,” which today would probably be called “virtue signaling”.

From LaVey’s essay in The Devil’s Notebook:

We’re going to offer this counter: maybe, just maybe, if you feel good when you help people, and you feel bad when you see people being hurt, and you act in the world to help people when no one else can act and accept their help when you can’t do something on your own — this is all just straightforwardly fine and desirable. Maybe wanting people to think highly of you based on how you treat the people closest to you in life is good. Badge or no badge, this is just being human and alive and living in a society (bottom text).

“Oh no! You selfishly didn’t abuse your long-time domestic partner because being kind and caring instead made you feel like a good person, too? That gave you joy? How will you ever recover?”

Anton LaVey was a douchebag, and fucking wearingly normal about it, too. He was a coward and a liar. According to people who knew him, he didn’t brush his teeth. According to them and by his own account, he didn’t bathe, and he smelled unpleasant. He was a plagiarist. With the exception of Barton, who has been able to hold on to the coattails of his legacy, it seems that everyone else in his family came to hate him. Regardless of how the Church of Satan tries to spin that, that says a lot about anyone.

Leaning on Wolfe’s book for the personal anecdotes but still a scholar in his own right, here’s how Ruben van Luijk summed it up in 2016.

From the “apolitical” Pentagonal Revisionism that LaVey wrote in 1988:

This is a man who, by the end of his life, was clearly looking up at achieving mediocrity.

The measuring stick he gave others when applied to him finds him to be a pathetic, unpleasant, disgusting edgelord — a crank who died broke in a shitty house gifted to him by the kindness of his parents, which he was allowed to stay in due to the kindness of a friend who was a sexual predator. And when Anton LaVey died, the crypto-fascists cried, but nothing of value was lost.

“Water must be allowed to seek its own level,” indeed.

Fuck Anton LaVey, and rest in piss.

Leave a Reply

The Satanic Temple's Boogeyman

Queer Satanic

TST sued us from April 2020 to September 2024, and we are still here.