We’re collaborating with some folk at Ave Satanas Podcast (ASP) and Free Society Satanists to bring you a miniseries looking at Might Is Right — ur-text of Satanism and an infamous work of proto-fascism first published in 1896 by Arthur Desmond a.k.a. “Ragnar Redbeard”.
To be clear: Might Is Right sucks, both as a book and ideology. It’s full of doggerel, bigotry, and contradictions. But we’re gonna talk about it, chapter-by-chapter, from the perspective of modern, anarchist Satanists who feel that racism, misogyny, antisemitism, and tyranny are “bad, actually”.
Livestreams (mostly) take place alternating weeks 9 p.m Eastern / 6 p.m. Pacific, including Friday Aug. 29 (0100 UTC Aug. 30), with podcasts released the following Saturday (Sep. 6), and new recordings taking place every two weeks:
RSS feed: https://feeds.buzzsprout.com/2383108.rss
(copy and paste the URL into the podcast app of your choice)
Folk who have thoughts on MIR and want to weigh in are welcome to join us on Twitch.
Assuming we can make the technical stuff work, the idea is for us to talk this week about the background of Arthur Desmond and Might Is Right, and why a piece of shit book like that is even worth investigating almost 130 years later.
(Spoiler: Anton LaVey plagiarized it for The Satanic Bible.)
Since we’re springing this on you suddenly, the chapter-by-chapter stuff won’t start until Friday Aug. 22, giving people time to do their reading and weigh-in. The first one will prolly be messy, but also to do some open table-setting about why we are bothering with this project now.
We’re using the mechanically impressive “Authoritative Edition” that Trevor Blake put together and published in 2019, harmonizing and annotating various versions, but nobody else ought to feel obligated to use that one rather than any of the free versions you can find floating around on the Web.
Frankly, if you follow along reading the 1910 edition published by “14 Words Press”, you are in some ways getting the more genuine and relevant version of this rancid fucking text, what it is all about, and it’s cultural significance than Blake’s version which falls all over itself in apologism.
This is not really a fun book to read, and if you haven’t read it before, maybe it’s not worth your while.
However, the fact that is bad actually helps to explain a lot of the stuff you see around you today, and the continuity of shit like incels and “anti-theist” antisemitism is also useful.
* * *
Ep. 1: Chapter 1 “Introductory” (pages 31-47)
(Might was right when Caesar bled / upon the stones of Rome, / Might was right when Joshua led / his hordes o’er Jordan’s foam, / And Might was right when German troops / poured down through Paris gay; / It’s the Gospel of the Ancient World / and the Logic of To-Day.)
OPPORTUNITIES A man’s opportunities are never exhausted so long as other men (who are not his friends) possess millions of acres and thousands of tons of gold.
Open your eyes that you may hear, O! men of mildewed minds and listen to me ye laborious millions! For I stand forth to challenge the wisdom of the world; to interrogate the “laws” of man and of “Good.” I request reasons for your Golden Rule and ask the why and wherefore of your Ten Commands. Before none of your printed idols do I bend in acquiescence and he who saith “thou shalt” to me is my mortal foe. I demand proof over all things, and accept (with reservations) even that which is true.
Prologue
As mentioned in the above, this part has always been in the book but moved around some. In the 1896 scanned edition on Internet archive, it’s at the back almost like a loose pamphlet inset, but there’s no notes from the Trevor Blake edition about why.
Ragnar says that if you’re poor, then you just need to rob others because that’s the source of wealth:
Another big idea of Ragnar’s is that fighting is happening all the time:
This is not amoralism that Ragnar will actually be able to sustain:
Ragnar treats this all as pathetic, effeminate, incompetent — but Christianity conquered the world, not Norse paganism:
What if someone could win more stuff and hold it longer with compromises and splitting the spoils? Would that be immoral?
Ragnar explicitly sees women as a possession and sign of wealth because he does not see them as people:
Section 1
This is the first place that Anton Lavey and Diane Hegarty plagiarized at length, almost word-for-word, to start off the “Book of Satan” portion of The Satanic Bible.
Some of the writing/ideas are compelling; you can see why LaVey pillaged it:
Death! I say death to every lie! I deny all things! I question all things!
Section 2
This section that makes the observation people inherit and are indoctrinated by what ethics and morals are, but does not stop to question whether bigotries could be inherited value systems, too.
“Natural law makes no false judgments”, so what’s wrong with these moral codes if they’re dominant?
Sounds good:
Is there a mouse in this motherfucker’s pocket? And how does “executive of mob” make sense?
Banger line, but are devils good here or bad?
Section 3
You could easily see a contemporary anti-theist atheist saying these sorts of things about Christianity, but probably substituting “Old Testament” or “Abrahamic” in the place of “”Semitic” or “Hebrew” to make the same criticisms.
How does Ragnar define evil here to get here?
Just straight up racism:
Section 4
The authoritative edition says there is no section 4, but then the 1927 edition I was reading online did have it, so a later publisher may have corrected it.
As an explanation for why, the 1896 scan looks like this, so they may just have gotten lost in the numbering while typesetting since page numbers and section numbers look the same.
Section 5
There is an incredible hubris to this section about how everyone else who came before built politics and philosophies on assumptions, but Ragnar is going to purify his racial mind and extinguish all the contagion that prevents rationality.
LaVey and The Satanic Bible pilfer from this at length, and Lucien Greaves of The Satanic Temple references it, which both parties call “poetry”. (Greaves in 2013: “Anton LaVey did not endorse the book in its entirety, but enjoyed its florid anti-God, anti-Christ poetry and its attempt at a strictly naturalistic philosophy — which to the author of MIR was a Social Darwinistic view. LaVey saw the book as a great leaping off point and pillaged full passages to construct The Satanic Bible.”) (Gilmore in 2019: “Might is Right is a book of action and not belief. It is poetry, not a platform.”)
How else is one to take this?:
Makes sense:
This is what TST’s seventh tenet is actually referencing:
Ostensibly this is about lies:
The author says sin doesn’t exist but continued to believe in it in regards to nature or natural law:
“Jews and Christs” really doesn’t hold up as equivalent categories, but also by what standard is the author defining “degenerates”? And for all the shit-talking about useless martyrs, why have Jews and Christians who venerate their martyrs been so successful at surviving and pulling their past forward to the present while Anglo-Saxons, Vikings, etc., were crushed?:
Section 6
Ragnar is worried about the threat to liberty by the menace of deception, but then seems to tell a positive story about using deception to overcome someone strong. Is that bad or good?
“WE LIVE IN A SOCIETY” is, weirdly and unironically, the most direct answer to this:
This story argues against the supposed point of the whole rest of the book; a strong warrior lost not due to a lack of martial prowess but because someone lied to him and tricked him:
Section 7
This is against believing stuff just because something is old or handed down, and fair enough, but how is this applicable to, say, Judaism, which has thousands of years of history of arguing about what has been handed down?
The author admits morality is in the service of the strong, so what else is his problem with these tools except that he is not powerful enough to abrogate them?:
Answer to the above:
In this quote, the author seems pretty clearly to envision himself as one of the ten and not one of the ten millions — but if that were so, why is he whining about morality instead of changing it? Why is not actually the master he claims he is?:
Section 8
There are some good lines in this final section, but it is a microcosm of Might Is Right in that as a whole and one thing to the next, it’s a big fucking mess that can’t see past its writer’s own nose.
This is such a promising beginning:
Weird:
This would be very cool if you did not know Redbeard includes “and this is good” along with this observation:
Phrase “human animals” spotted, but also, the idea that nothing changes seems especially odd to suggest in the late 19th century:
Then why do these other things persevere?
“Power is non-moral” — except that the author hates everything except power, and specifically violent power:
On the other hand, as always, where does this moralizing come from?:
David
Jack
Sai
Felo
Basically, this is the part that had the biggest impact on TSB. Twenty-six (26) of the excerpts come from this portion (versus twenty [20] for chapter II and five [5] for chapter III). MIR text with with plagiarism highlighted.
MIR 1927 Chapter / Section # | Might Is Right | The Satanic Bible | TSB Book of Satan |
Chapter I Section 1 | In this arid wilderness of steel and stone I raise up my voice that you may hear. To the East and to the West I beckon. To the North and to the South I show a sign — Proclaiming “Death to the weakling, wealth to the strong.” | In this arid wilderness of steel and stone I raise up my voice that you may hear. To the East and to the West I beckon. To the North and to the South I show a sign proclaiming: Death to the weakling, wealth to the strong! | Book I No. 1 |
Chapter I Section 1 | Open your eyes that you may hear, O! men of mildewed minds and listen to me, ye laborious millions! | Open your eyes that you may see, Oh men of mildewed minds, and listen to me ye bewildered millions! | Book I No. 2 |
Chapter I Section 1 | For I stand forth to challenge the wisdom of the world; to interrogate the “laws” of man and of “God.” | For I stand forth to challenge the wisdom of the world; to interrogate the “laws” of man and of “God”! | Book I No. 3 |
Chapter I Section 1 | I request reasons for your Golden Rule and ask the why and wherefore of your Ten Commands. | I request reason for your golden rule and ask the why and wherefore of your ten commandments. | Book I No. 4 |
Chapter I Section 1 | Before none of your printed idols do I bend in acquiescence and he who saith “thou shalt” to me is my mortal foe. | Before none of your printed idols do I bend in acquiescence, and he who saith “thou shalt” to me is my mortal foe! | Book I No. 5 |
Chapter I Section 1 | I dip my forefinger in the watery blood of your impotent mad-redeemer (your Divine Democrat — your Hebrew Madman) and write over his thorn-torn brow, “The true prince of Evil — the king of the Slaves!” | I dip my forefinger in the watery blood of your impotent mad redeemer, and write over his thorn-torn brow: The TRUE prince of evil – the king of slaves! | Book I No. 6 |
Chapter I Section 1 | No hoary falsehood shall be a truth to me — no cult or dogma shall encramp my pen. | No hoary falsehood shall be a truth to me; no stifling dogma shall encramp my pen! | Book I No. 7 |
Chapter I Section 1 | I break away from all conventions. Alone, untrammeled. | I break away from all conventions that do not lead to my earthly success and happiness. | Book I No. 8 |
Chapter I Section 1 | I raise up in stern invasion the standard of Strong. | I raise up in stern invasion the standard of the strong! | Book I No. 9 |
Chapter I Section 1 | I gaze into the glassy eye of your fearsome Jehovah, and pluck him by the beard — I uplift a broad-axe and split open his worm-eaten skull. | I gaze into the glassy eye of your fearsome Jehovah, and pluck him by the beard; I uplift a broad-axe, and split open his worm-eaten skull! | Book I No. 10 |
Chapter I Section 1 | I blast out the ghastly contents of philosophic whited sepulchres and laugh with sardonic wrath. | I blast out the ghastly contents of philosophically whited sepulchers and laugh with sardonic wrath! | Book I No. 11 |
Chapter I Section 1 | Behold the crucifix, what does it symbolize? Pallid incompetence hanging on a tree. | Behold the crucifix; what does it symbolize? Pallid incompetence hanging on a tree. | Book II No. 1 |
Chapter I Section 1 | Then reaching up the festering and varnished facades of your haughtiest moral dogmas, I write thereon in letters of blazing scorn: — “Lo and behold, all this is fraud!” [Section break] I deny all things! I question all things! | I question all things. As I stand before the festering and varnished facades of your haughtiest moral dogmas, I write thereon in letters of blazing scorn: Lo and behold; all this is fraud! | Book II No. 2 |
Chapter I Section 1 | And yet! And yet! — Gather around me O! ye death-defiant, and the earth itself shall be thine, to have and to hold. | Gather around me, Oh! ye death-defiant, and the earth itself shall be thine, to have and to hold! | Book II No. 3 |
Chapter I Section 3 | Too long the dead hand has been permitted to sterilize living thought | Too long the dead hand has been permitted to sterilize living thought! | Book II No. 4 |
Chapter I Section 3 | — too long, right and wrong, good and evil, have been inverted by false prophets. | Too long right and wrong, good and evil have been inverted by false prophets! | Book II No. 5 |
Chapter I Section 3 | In the days that are at hand, neither creed nor code must be accepted upon authority, human, superhuman or ‘divine.’ (Morality and conventionalism are for subordinates.) Religions and constitutions and all arbitrary principles, every mortal theorem, must be deliberately put to the question. No moral dogma must be taken for granted — no standard of measurement deified. There is nothing inherently sacred about moral codes. Like the wooden idols of long ago, they are all the work of human hands, and what man has made, man can destroy. | No creed must be accepted upon authority of a “divine” nature. Religions must be put to the question. No moral dogma must be taken for granted – no standard of measurement deified. There is nothing inherently sacred about moral codes. Like the wooden idols of long ago, they are the work of human hands, and what man has made, man can destroy! | Book II No. 6 |
Chapter I Section 3 | He that is slow to believe anything and everything is of great understanding, for belief in one false principle, is the beginning of all unwisdom. | He that is slow to believe anything and everything is of great understanding, for belief in one false principle is the beginning of all unwisdom. | Book II No. 7 |
Chapter I Section 3 | The chief duty of every new age is to up-raise new men to determine its liberties, to lead it towards material success — to rend (as it were) the rusty padlocks and chains of dead custom that always prevent healthy expansion. Theories and ideals and constitutions, that may have meant life and hope, and freedom, for our ancestors, may now mean destruction, slavery and dishonor to us. | The chief duty of every new age is to upraise new men to determine its liberties, to lead it towards material success – to rend the rusty padlocks and chains of dead custom that always prevent healthy expansion. Theories and ideas that may have meant life and hope and freedom for our ancestors may now mean destruction, slavery, and dishonor to us! | Book II No. 8 |
Chapter I Section 3 | As environments change no human ideal standeth sure. | As environments change, no human ideal standeth sure! | Book II No. 9 |
Chapter I Section 3 | Wherever, therefore, a lie has built unto itself a throne, let it be assailed without pity and without regret, for under the domination of a falsehood, no nation can permanently prosper. | Whenever, therefore, a lie has built unto itself a throne, let it be assailed without pity and without regret, for under the domination of an inconvenient falsehood, no one can prosper. | Book II No. 10 |
Chapter I Section 3 | Let established sophisms be dethroned, rooted out, burnt and destroyed, for they are a standing menace to all true nobility of thought and action. | Let established sophisms be dethroned, rooted out, burnt and destroyed, for they are a standing menace to all true nobility of thought and action! | Book II No. 11 |
Chapter I Section 3 | Whatever alleged “truth” is proven by results, to be but an empty fiction, let it be unceremoniously flung into the outer darkness, among the dead gods, dead empires, dead philosophies, and other useless lumber and wreckage. | Whatever alleged “truth” is proven by results to be but an empty fiction, let it be unceremoniously flung into the outer darkness, among the dead gods, dead empires, dead philosophies, and other useless lumber and wreckage! | Book II No. 12 |
Chapter I Section 3 | The most dangerous of all enthroned lies is the holy, the sanctified, the privileged lie — the lie that “everybody” believes to be a model truth. It is the fruitful mother of all other popular errors and delusions. It is hydra-headed. It has a thousand roots. It is a social cancer. | The most dangerous of all enthroned lies is the holy, the sanctified, the privileged lie – the lie everyone believes to be a model truth. It is the fruitful mother of all other popular errors and delusions. It is a hydra-headed tree of unreason with a thousand roots. It is a social cancer! | Book II No. 13 |
Chapter I Section 3 | The lie that is known to be a lie is half eradicated, but the lie that even intelligent persons regard as a sacred fact — the lie that has been inculcated around a mother’s knee — is more dangerous to contend against than a creeping pestilence. | The lie that is known to be a lie is half eradicated, but the lie that even intelligent persons accept as fact – the lie that has been inculcated in a little child at its mother’s knee – is more dangerous to contend against than a creeping pestilence! | Book II No. 14 |
Chapter I Section 3 | Popular lies have ever been the most potent enemies of personal liberty. There is only one way to deal with them. Cut them out, to the very core, just as cancers are. Exterminate them root and branch, or they will surely eat us all up. We must annihilate them, or they will us. | Popular lies have ever been the most potent enemies of personal liberty. There is only one way to deal with them: Cut them out, to the very core, just as cancers. Exterminate them root and branch. Annihilate them, or they will us! | Book II No. 15 |
TST sued us from April 2020 to September 2024, and we are still here.